Enemy Of The State

My solution for Illegal Immigration: He who owns the property makes the rules....

2006-12-26T21:06:00.000-08:00

“If history could teach us anything, it would be that private property is inextricably linked with civilization.”--Ludwig Von Mises

One of the most contentious issues today even among Libertarians is that of Illegal Immigration.

Some people suggest the way to solve this problem is to build a wall on the border between the US and Mexico. I refer to these people as the Berlin Wall people.

Others suggest we should limit the number of people entering the country.

Still others suggest that people who hire Illegals should be punished for doing so as a way of curbing Illegal Immigration. These same people further suggest that people should be punished
for offering housing to Illegals.

Yet another way that is being suggested as a way of curbing Illegal Immigration is to not allow Illegal Immigrants access to any Public services such as Welfare or Hospitals.

What is lost in all these arguments though is what should be the only argument that really matters (and sadly even Libertarians seem to overlook this) and that is of private property.

If you truly own your property (yes I know and I can already hear Libertarians screaming,"BUT YOU DON'T OWN YOUR PROPERTY!!!" but lets put this aside for a moment)
then only you can justly make rules over who is allowed access to it. Not the Federal Government, not the State of Texas, not the Citizens of the US or Texas but you. You are also the only one who can justly distribute it.

Therefore, when someone says you cannot pay someone with the property YOU have earned simply because they have not been granted a privilege known as Citizenship (which is really Government claiming ownership over your life but I digress) then what you are really saying is the Government has a higher claim to an individuals property than the rightful owner does.

This is not a recipe for freedom but Socialism!

The same can be said for someone who offers someone somewhere to stay in exchange for money. The only person that justly make such a decision is the property owner.

"But they're stealing jobs from us Americans!"

I am simply amazed at how many supposedly freedom loving Libertarians have uttered such nonsense.

First it assumes that an economy is some finite piece of pie that at some point reaches full distribution and then anyone left over gets screwed!

Only with Statist distribution does this take place. Been in a Traffic Jam lately?

Second, this suggests that much like Health Care or Public Schooling or Housing that people are entitled to a job and that you can therefore use guns to force people to hire you instead of who they choose to hire regardless of status.

"But it's just not fair that they hire a Mexican at a lower wage instead of hiring me!"

Well as I said to a friend that said this to me,"Your personal feelings don't determine whether or not I get to use my property."

So to summarize:

If someone comes here from Mexico by my invitation then you (either individually or collectively as one of the Citizens of the US or Texas) have NO say in the matter. If I further invite them to work on MY property then you have NO say in the matter. If I further offer them a place for shelter then you have NO say in the matter. This is how individual property rights is SUPPOSED to work which is why the Government is working so hard to SUPPRESS it.

So there you have it, my solution for the Illegal Immigration problem.

He who owns the property makes the rules.

Patrick Sovereign,
Enemy of The State

The State Engages in Legalized Kidnapping to Stem the Tide Of "Illegal Immigration". I feel safer already.....

2006-04-30T22:13:00.000-07:00

"Americans are being conditioned to live in a Soviet-style prison nation with border minefields, national electronic ID, travel controls, random searches, etc. all justified by the need to protect the welfare state against the poor of the world. It isn’t the libertarian’s job to defend the welfare state, or the Gulag that it always becomes. It is our job to point out that the State itself is the problem. Without the US government support for Third World kleptocracies, more countries would be free (and more people would want to stay there). Without public schools, "free" medical care, etc., immigrants would not drain our nation. They would power it, as they did in the early 20th century."--"The Immigration Solution" by Bill Walker

How can seemingly sensible Libertarians be so wrong on the issue of Illegal Immigration?

The recent round up of illegals (statist speak for legalized kidnapping) is troubling to me to say the least.

Libertarians by in large understand that the State should not be trusted with our guns, our money, our children to educate them, our speech, et all yet the State suddenly becomes a benevolent granter of all that is holy when it comes to dealing with Illegal Immigration?

This contradition in both simple logic and common sense just boggles my mind.

If anything, more of us should be illegal aliens.

We should outright refuse any and all documention of us by the State which amounts to the State claiming us as it's property.

Yet the answer to solving the 'problem' is to terrorize a group of people who are not documented by the State. And not being numbered by the State is bad because?

Oh but don't you understand they're draining our resources and stealing our jobs!

First of all, the only one responsible for draining resources of all of us is the State.

Who they give the stolen loot to is irrelevent.

Shutdown the Welfare State and the draining of resources will take care of itself.

The stealing of American jobs by 'illegals' is an amazing absurdity uttered by even otherwise sensible Libertarians which also blows my mind.

Since when is anyone entitled to a job?

The question answers itself.

You have no more of a right to a job than you do Health Care, a living wage, Housing, or anything else for that matter.

I cannot believe in America we've already come to the point where people can be just grabbed off the street and thrown into vans for being from a certain ethnic group and don't give me this bunk that they are only targeting illegals.

http://www.breitbart.com/news/2006/05/04/D8HD34RO0.html

Just like the Drug War there are innocent people being swept up in the irrational fear of the supposed threat of illegals which itself is a HUGE lie told to get the brainwashed masses to sign on.

Yes there are a few individuals genuinely concerned about the border but the answer is NOT to engage in this kind of brutality but to allow people to protect their property locally and remove the Government ENTIRELY out of Border Patrol and Immigration.

Then again it did such a BRILLIANT job on 9/11 and with Hurricane Katrina, why shouldn't we trust it to manage the Border and Immigration?

It has NO CLUE what it is doing and it has no incentive to be productive since it lives off stolen loot and didn't earn the position by satisfying customers like every market endeavor must do in order to not only survive but prosper.

What is going on in Arizona and neighboring States is nothing more than legalized kidnapping because that is EXACTLY what we'd be called, Kidnappers, if we engaged in the same behavior be they legal citizens or not.

This Police Posse thing going on in Arizona is abhorrent but then again we are talking about the State.

Patrick Sovereign,

Enemy of The State

"[During the 20th century] … 170 million men, women, and children have been shot, beaten, tortured, knifed, burned, starved, frozen, crushed, or worked to death; buried alive, drowned, hung, bombed, or killed in any other of the myriad ways governments have inflicted death on unarmed, helpless citizens and foreigners." – R. J. Rummel, Death by Government

The Masked Man Unmasks The Criminal State To Show Us The Monster It Truly Is and In Doing So May Save Humanity From The Madness Of It All.......

2006-03-19T16:36:00.000-08:00

"How can you possibly make any difference?

Individuals have no power in this modern world.

That is what you've been taught because that is what they need you to believe.

But it is not true.This is why they are afraid and the reason that I am here; to remind you that it is individuals who always hold the power.

The real power. Individuals like me. And individuals like you.
I have come to offer you a deal. If you accept, I will give you a different world.

A world without curfews, without soldiers and surveillance systems.

A world that is not run by other men but that is run by you.

I am offering you a second chance."--V for Vendetta

Fear is a natural emotion. There is nothing inherently bad or evil about it.

On the contrary, fear can be a great motivator. It can motivate you to do things you only dreamed about and never thought imaginable.

We all have experienced fear at one point or another in our lives. Fear of failure. Fear of growing old. Fear of dying. Fear of never being loved.

Yet, we all overcome these fears to accomplish many things. We become prosperous. We take care of our health to ensure an enjoyable life into our elder years. We make sensible decisions that directly impact our lives to protect our lives and those that we love. We may even find someone to love and start a family.

As I said, fear can be a great motivator and there is nothing inherently bad or evil about it.

However, fear can be used for evil as well as good and this where V for Vendetta and the Criminal State come in.

As V says in the movie,"Fear became the ultimate tool of this government." and he is right both about the Government he knew and the Government we now know.

You might well say "But the Government protects us and if they didn't we'd be dead and then what good is your precious freedoms?"

Now there is the rub.

My response would be is as follows,"What good is your life if you are not free?"

The answer is obviously that it is worth nothing but let me get back to the purpose of this discussion.

And that is of fear.

The Government we currently know uses fear on a daily basis to take our freedoms away and by the looks of things it looks like it is working.

On a daily basis I hear fear mongering about Illegal Immigration, Terrorism, Plagues, Environmental Disaster, Crime, Corrupt Businessmen, to you name it.

And just what is the purpose of this fear mongering?

If you are among the less cynical and tragically most are in this group you would genuinely suggest that The Government truly cares about you and is only doing what is in your best interests. But is it?

As I am in the group with the most cynicism I would submit that the reason for all this is far more insidious, far more sinister than most people would prefer to contemplate.

As was the motivating factor of V's Government it is for your Government.

It is control.

Your Government has used fear to imprison you. Fear has allowed your freedoms and dignity to be robbed from you without a whimper of protest.

The news bombards you with fear to further cloud and contaminate your mind and prevent you from seeing the evil going on all around you.

It happens in the Airport by total strangers who fondle your loved ones, on street corners where Police congregate to harass the innocent. It happens in the halls of Justice where Judges convict people of crimes which don't exist except in the madcap mind of a bureaucrat. It happens in businesses that are terrorized by the States goons into complying with every rule, every regulation out of fear of losing their business. It happens when you pay taxes in compliance of laws that are a fiction but you allow this evil be done to you out of fear. It happens the moment you leave your very house making sure all your papers are in order for fear of being stopped without them.

Fear has served this Government well and will continue to do so because you sheepishly obey it's commands.

Fear has been used by The Criminal State to divide and conquer us all in the pursuit of total power. Or has it?

See it's not over yet. The State still needs many years to completely conquer us as there are still a few with the courage to resist, but for how long?

In the age of Terrorism noncompliance with Government dictates is seen as a dangerous act of sedition and not to be tolerated in the least.

Much like in V for Vendetta those that do resist the evils of the State are labeled traitors, terrorists, or worse and some are even held as enemy combatants.

How did all this happen in such a short period of time and what does it hold for our future and that of our progeny?

V makes a very pointed statement today and it is one many should take to heart although I doubt many will:

"People should not be afraid of their Governments, Governments should be afraid of their people."

If there is one thing I truly hope happens as a result of this Anti State Masterpiece of powerful messages (not the least of which is that it is individuals that make a difference and not collectives) it is this.

I hope people shake off the fear and realize they allowed fear to enable their Government to do evil things in their name and that they will be motivated to put a stop to the madness of it all.

Remember Remember the state of fear the State has plotted to engender.

Patrick Sovereign,

Enemy of The State

Why The Left and Right Hate Freedom and Love The State, but I repeat myself....

2006-01-20T01:13:00.000-08:00

"In contrast to all other thinkers, left, right, or in-between, the libertarian refuses to give the State the moral sanction to commit actions that almost everyone agrees would be immoral, illegal, and criminal if committed by any person or group in society. "--Murray N.Rothbard,The Libertarian Manifesto

In a recent blog posting, one Don Crawford took me and others to task labeling us and I am paraphrasing, haters of America and it's ideals.

Below is an exact quote from his blog:

"First of all, many that hate America seem oblivious to the obvious fact that if America's government were miraculously disbanded, this country would not remain with no government. As the founders recognized and therefore held the Constitutional Convention, and as Thomas Sowell so powerfully describes in Conquest . . . , the whole history of civilization is that if a nation is not strong enough to defend itself, it will be taken captive and enslaved by an aggressor nation."

This is the typical tactic of the Statist. Instead of addressing the moral confusion created by ALL State action (as noted in the above Rothbard quote) they seek to tear down those that challenge the bankrupt morality of the State.

Don't misunderstand me, the Left does this too but I am addressing a Right Wing Talk Show Host's comments for the purposes of this piece.

You only have to look at the Soviet Union as an example to see that if the US Govt withered away and died that we would not descend into chaos as Don believes. There most certainly would be a period of adjustment, just like there was in the Soviet Union, but ultimately our country would survive albeit in a less centralized manner which can only be beneficial to individual Liberty.

To address Dons second point in the quote above, the whole of civilization is also replete with examples of bands of people fighting off and keeping at bay aggressive States the latest example of which is in Iraq.

I would like to review one more part of the posting Don made before launching into my main purpose for writing this piece:

"Second, why on earth do so many like Patrick seem so out of touch with reality that they don't grasp that they live in the greatest nation in the history of the world in terms of freedom and the ability to protect their freedom to be so stupid? Therefore, instead of feeling immeasurable gratitude for America, the rational emotion for any citizen of the U.S.A., they incredibly feel hatred toward her."

Reality?

Most historians regard the 20th Century to be the bloodiest on record and it is also when the State came into full fruition.

Coincidence? I think not.

We "live in the greatest nation in the history of the world in terms of freedom" because of the great accomplishments of individuals and because of this we have experienced wealth many people in other countries only dream about.

Not because of the State, BUT IN SPITE OF IT!

I agree with you that our ability to be stupid is protected.
The creation of a State is an admission that you are too stupid to manage your own life and need someone to shepherd you around in the decision making processes of your life.
Creation of the State is acceptance of ones individual weakness and not a strength as asserted by the Statists both Left and Right.

Hateful of America? No. America because of it's 'Free Market' (I put it in quotes because it's much closer to Socialist than most people realize) Economy has given me and other people opportunities that people in other countries only dream about.

It is the State, with it's constant meddling with and destruction of freedom that I truly despise.

That is an inherent feature of the State though.....

Look the world over and you will find always and everywhere people oppressed by their States edicts. Our country is no different, we just refuse to acknowledge it either out of ignorance or by erroneously associating our abundance with the existence of the US Govt.

Which brings me FINALLY! to the title of this piece:

"Why The Left and Right Hate Freedom and Love The State, but I repeat myself...."

Unlike Don, I prefer to avoid name calling which is why I will now say I don't think the Left or the Right hate freedom although one might wrongly conclude this by their love of State power.
The title was about "illustrating absurdity by being absurd" to quote a Talk Show Host I used to listen to.

It's equally absurd to suggest that people who have honest disagreements with Government action are 'America Haters' as it is for me to suggest that those that love the State hate freedom.
I believe what we have here is a matter of understanding.

Both the Left and the Right do not understand freedom nor do they understand the true nature of the State.

Freedom is the simply having full control over your life, liberty, and property.
To the degree that a State exists is the degree to which this is undermined.
What then is the State?

I think Murray N. Rothbard, who has been my main motivation for creating this site, understood full well what the State was.

This question above is the one all Statists (both Left and Right) avoid like the plague, mainly because they benefit from it's banditry.

In essence when you get past all the high minded rhetoric about helping the poor and protecting the weak (Statist-Speak for those you want to control and exploit) the State is an institution of graft, theft, and murder.

I can think of no better words to describe it.

Patrick Sovereign,
Enemy of The State

I spy......A Tyrannical Government!

2005-12-19T22:37:00.000-08:00

"The government's been in bed with the entire telecommunications industry since the forties. They've infected everything. They get into your bank statements, computer files, email, listen to your phone calls... Every wire, every airwave. The more technology used, the easier it is for them to, keep tabs on you. It's a brave new world out there. At least it better be."--Brill from the movie "Enemy Of The State"

In the movie "Enemy Of The State" the main character is tracked because it is believed that he has something that could embarrass a prominent public official. The agency that tracks him electronically throughout the film is the NSA and it seemed rather 'out there' until I heard about our own President declaring us all Enemy's Of The State:

"Under a presidential order signed in 2002, the intelligence agency has monitored the international telephone calls and international e-mail messages of hundreds, perhaps thousands, of people inside the United States without warrants over the past three years in an effort to track possible "dirty numbers" linked to Al Qaeda, the officials said. The agency, they said, still seeks warrants to monitor entirely domestic communications."

http://www.nytimes.com/2005/12/15/politics/15cnd-program.html?ei=5094&en=0a4739ca3ab6d63b&hp=&ex=1134709200&partner=homepage&pagewanted=print&oref=login

If this wasn't outrageous enough this type of in your face TYRANNY, the President has gone on record as saying (and this is an accurate reflection of his reaction to the leak) that basically he doesn't care if peoples rights were violated and will continue spying on Americans.

He is actually angry that the NY Times (god bless them!) have exposed his despotism and called the NY Times 'shameful'.

No Mr. Aspiring Fascist 4th Reich wanna be you are the one that should be ashamed of yourself.

The only that has committed Treason against the lives, liberties, and property of the American people is you by your despicable act.

Here are a couple quotes about the same story from our aspiring Dictator:

"My personal opinion is it was a shameful act for someone to disclose this very important program in a time of war," Bush told a news conference at which he was questioned repeatedly about the controversial operation disclosed on Friday by The new York Times.

"You got to understand, and I hope the American people understand, there is still an enemy that would like to strike the United States of America and they are very dangerous."

http://cnn.netscape.cnn.com/news/story.jsp?id=2005121911350002963737&dt=20051219113500&w=RTR&coview=

Yes and that enemy occupys 1600 Pennsylvania Avenue and is becoming more dangerous everyday.

I spy......A Tyrannical Government!

Patrick Sovereign,
Enemy of The State

Can an Anarchist experience Schadenfreude? HELL YEAH!

2005-12-16T23:11:00.000-08:00

"In conclusion, I still maintain that George Bush and his subordinates knowingly lied us into war. Let me offer one last bit of armchair logic: If Bush really thought Saddam (a) had stockpiles of WMD and (b) was too crazy to respond rationally to threats of reprisal, then why would Bush send in American troops? Can you imagine the public outcry if, say, 850 US troops were killed in a single day by chemical weapons? Wouldn’t it make a lot more sense to invade Iraq if the president knew Saddam would love to acquire (but didn’t quite yet have) those nasty weapons?"Who's lying about Iraq?" by Bob Murphy

Just who is lying about Iraq? Apparently the soldiers are starting to figure out and one has even vented his frustrations on the Warmongering supporters of the President.

On a story such as the one I am about to discuss I feel torn.

On the one hand, my advocacy as an Anarchist in the inviolability of private property I find it incredibly hard (although tempting) to applaud the actions of the Officer in this story.

I must confess though to feeling a certain level of guilty pleasure upon hearing what this man did.

Below is an excerpt from the story:

"DENVER - The Air Force Reserve plans to discharge a lieutenant colonel accused of defacing cars that had pro-Bush bumper stickers, the military said Friday. Lt. Col. Alexis Fecteau, a pilot with 500 combat hours in the first Persian Gulf war and the Balkans, is charged with criminal mischief for allegedly using paint stripper to write a profanity about Bush in 18-inch-high letters on cars at Denver International Airport.
The cars had bumper stickers supporting President Bush and conservative talk-show host Rush Limbaugh."

http://www.breitbart.com/news/2005/12/16/D8EHG7AG2.html

I cannot wait to hear the Bushitas spin on this story!

"We believe it was one of those weak kneed limp wristed cut and run Liberals."

Right......With 500 combat hours in the First Persian Gulf war and the Balkans.

Which brings me to my opening question in the title of this piece.

Can an Anarchist experience Schadenfreude? HELL YEAH!

Oh well, if I am going to go to hell I might as well enjoy the ride!

Patrick Sovereign,
Enemy of The State

God Bless Howard Stern! The FCC's days are numbered...One can only hope.

2005-12-16T22:37:00.000-08:00

'WE PLAYED DILDO GOLF, WE PLAYED WHEEL OF SEX, WE ARE THE LAST OF A DYING BREED. THIS IS A BIG MOMENT. WE BROKE EVERY RULE KNOWN TO RADIO AND MANKIND. THE GOVERNMENT SAYS CLEAN UP YOUR ACT, WE SAY NEVER.'--Howard Stern at a rally celebrating his entry into uncensored Commercial Satellite Radio

I usually do not talk about celebrities on this site but this is too good of a story to ignore.

Howard Stern, the self proclaimed King Of All Media and a permanent thorn in the side of Station Managers not to mention the Fascist FCC almost since his first day on the air held a rally in which he celebrated his entry into Commercial (meaning not controlled by the busybodies at the FCC) radio on Sirius Satellite Radio:

"I wanna ram that fist right up (radio station owner) Clear Channel Broadcasting, I wanna ram that fist up the religious right. ... For all those radio stations that fired me: F-em! You fired me? We fired YOU!" Stern crowed.

http://today.reuters.com/news/NewsArticle.aspx?type=entertainmentNews&storyID=uri:2005-12-16T193346Z_01_KRA628036_RTRUKOC_0_US-MEDIA-STERN.xml&pageNumber=1&summit=

To be totally honest I have only listened to Howard Stern maybe twice but that is my choice which is exactly the point here.

The Government has no right ( and I don't give flying flip what the FCC says) to tell you what you can and cannot listen to or watch for that matter. The Government is not your father and it is NOT your mother and it's about time people start taking responsibility for their own and more importantly the lives of their children.

If Howard Stern says something that offends you or you find in poor taste then CHANGE THE FREAKIN CHANNEL!

If you have children and don't want them to listen then DON'T FREAKIN LET EM!

I have never been a fan of Howard Stern as noted by my comments above but....

GOD BLESS HOWARD STERN for thumbing his nose at another useless Government agency which means the FCC's days are numbered, one can only hope.

Patrick Sovereign,
Enemy of The State

Homeland Scarecurity Thugs get their first kill....I feel safer already! NOT!

2005-12-10T22:26:00.000-08:00

"[During the 20th century]... 170 million men, women, and children have been shot, beaten, tortured, knifed, burned, starved, frozen, crushed, or worked to death; buried alive, drowned, hung, bombed, or killed in any other of the myriad ways governments have inflicted death on unarmed, helpless citizens and foreigners."- R. J. Rummel, Death by Government

The violence that is the essence of ALL State action was on full display on December 7th 2005 in Miami where an innocent American was MURDERED (the gunning down of someone like he was some sort of rabid dog is NOT an accident!) by Homeland Security Thugs (aka Federal Air Marshals) for supposedly having a bomb.

This action must have been part of those great new enhanced security measures the TSA Nazis have been talking about!

Since this story broke several eyewitnesses (guess the Air Marshals weren't that good a shot or ran out of bullets) have stated since the Government's story (aka Big Lie) was reported
ad neuseam by the Government media that the man never said he had a bomb. Oops! Somebody's lying and I bet this group also knows where the WMD's are buried!

An excerpt reporting of the execution of this collateral damage (Government speak for someone standing in the way of us exercising more power) in the War on Terror (looks like the Air Marshals got the Terror part mastered) is below:

"The passenger, identified as Rigoberto Alpizar, a 44-year-old U.S. citizen, was gunned down on a jetway just before the American Airlines plane was about to leave for Orlando, near his home in Maitland."

"It was quite scary," she told the TV station via a cell phone. "They wouldn't let you move. They wouldn't let you get anything out of your bag."

http://www.breitbart.com/news/2005/12/07/D8EBOHE8I.html

Just another day in the War Of Terror!

Terrorizing the American citizenry that is.

Patrick Sovereign,
Enemy of The State (Until my last breath!)

2005-12-04T23:19:00.000-08:00

Enemy of The State

DISOBEY! When faced with State aggression!

2005-12-02T21:42:00.000-08:00

"Disobedience is the true foundation of liberty. The obedient must be slaves." – Henry David Thoreau

Just how did we reach such utter contempt for human liberty that a bunch of thugs can commandeer a bus and demand everyone (who have done NOTHING WRONG!) produce ID

and when one person refuses to be treated like cattle they are immediately arrested?!?

The answer is the War on Freedom...err...Terror.

Since the War on Terror has been declared Law EnFORCEment has concluded there is NO limits on what they can do to terrorize the citizenry.

This started with the airports. Then has mission creeped over to the Subway system.

Now we cannot even sit quietly on a Bus without Jackbooted Thugs getting in our faces and demanding we show our papers?

The latest outrage occured in Lakewood Colorado and excerpts from the article are below:

"Davis, 50, of Arvada, refused in September to show her identification when federal police boarded RTD's No. 100 bus when it entered the Federal Center. Davis wasn't getting off there but riding through on her way to work elsewhere, as were some other passengers.

Federal police removed her from the bus and handcuffed and ticketed her for refusing to show her ID. She is scheduled to appear in federal court Dec. 9. "

http://www.rockymountainnews.com/drmn/local/article/0,1299,DRMN_15_4279299,00.html

What is as shocking (if not moreso) than someone getting arrested for merely refusing to identify herself (circa 1930s Germany) is a response to what she did by one of the readers of the newspaper also in the article:

"They should have shot this (expletive deleted) first and then looked through her purse for ID."

No doubt a Bush 4th Reich supporter and listener of Conservative Talk Radio!

Not all readers shared this persons vile Statist views though:

"Good for her. This country is becoming more and more a police state!!!! Well done!!"

Well done indeed.

Patrick Sovereign,

Enemy of The State (now more than ever)

Antiwar, the only defensible position to take...unless you are dealing with your own Government.

2005-11-30T23:29:00.000-08:00

"If you want to remain free, you must always be wary of government, because governments, not private terrorists, are and always have been the greatest threats to liberty and the greatest mass murderers in history."-- Syndicated Columnist Charlie Reese

And so it has come to this.....

We cannot even enter a bank anymore without our own Government menacing us with guns and demanding we show our papers.

I first heard about this story on ABC News Radio and could not believe what I was hearing:

"By CURT ANDERSONAssociated Press WriterNov 28 9:28 PM US/Eastern

MIAMI - Miami police announced Monday they will stage random shows of force at hotels, banks and other public places to keep terrorists guessing and remind people to be vigilant. Deputy Police Chief Frank Fernandez said officers might, for example, surround a bank building, check the IDs of everyone going in and out and hand out leaflets about terror threats."

http://www.breitbart.com/news/2005/11/28/D8E5RPBO5.html

We might declare Martial Law in random places, like the airport, or the subway, or maybe your local bank.

Don't worry though, it's all to protect your freedom.

So while Conservatives are blathering about the outrage of calling an Xmas Tree a Holiday Tree and the adopting a killer for the State our own Barbarians are at the gate destroying freedom here at home all in the interest of protecting it.

The only reason our Government can get away with this overt aggression against the citizenry is tacit support of the War on Terror and by extension the War on Iraq which is their justification for all of this.

If one believes that a National Security State destroys freedom as is made clear by the above

cited article, then the only defensible position is to be Antiwar as it is the aggression of War that is feeding the march towards a Police State and destruction of freedom at home.

On the other hand, War appears to be the only thing that might bring our own Government to heel from its aggression.

Patrick Sovereign,

Enemy of The State

Iraqi Interim Government loots treasury and leaves. If only our own Government would leave after plundering us!

2005-10-19T23:04:00.000-07:00

"The highwayman takes solely upon himself the responsibility, danger, and crime of his own act. He does not pretend that he has any rightful claim to your money, or that he intends to use it for your own benefit … Furthermore, having taken your money, he leaves you, as you wish him to do … He does not keep "protecting" you by commanding you to bow down and serve him; by requiring you to do this, and forbidding you to do that." – Lysander Spooner

This story is just priceless!

As reported by ABC News the US installed interim Government has apparently made off with some cash, about 1 Billion worth according to reports:

"BAGHDAD, Iraq Oct 10, 2005 — Iraq has issued arrest warrants against the defense minister and 27 other officials from the U.S.-backed government of former Prime Minister Iyad Allawi over the alleged disappearance or misappropriation of $1 billion in military procurement funds, officials said Monday.

Those accused include four other ministers from Allawi's government, which was replaced by an elected Cabinet led by Shiite parties in April, said Ali al-Lami of Iraq's Integrity Commission. Many of the officials are believed to have left Iraq, including Hazem Shaalan, the former defense minister who moved to Jordan shortly after the new government was installed."

http://abcnews.go.com/International/wireStory?id=1201279

What I want to know is why can't our own Government skip town and LEAVE US ALONE! after it loots us?

Government has been described by more than one Anarchist as nothing more than a band of thieves and these people lived up to that reputation.

There is a silver lining in this dark cloud of corruption though.

At least they didn't stay long enough to be a legitimate Government.

Then they would have been granted a license to loot.

This has got to be the most corrupt Government I have ever heard of.

Except for all the rest.

Patrick Sovereign,
Enemy of The State

MIERS FOUND REPUBLICAN, TURNED CHRIST

2005-10-04T22:29:00.000-07:00

As reported on Drudge Report in a News Flash:

MIERS FOUND REPUBLICAN, TURNED CHRIST

By 1979, Harriet Miers, then in her mid-30s, had accomplished what some people take a lifetime to achieve. She was a partner at Locke Purnell Boren Laney & Neely, one of the most prestigious law firms in the South. But she still felt something was missing in her life.

The NEW YORK TIMES is set to splash the "something" on Page Ones on Wednesday, newsroom sources tell God almighty himself!

It was after a series of long discussions with Nathan Hecht, a junior colleague and sweetheart, that led her to a decision that many of the people around her say changed Miers life.

"She decided that she wanted Republicans to be a bigger part of her life," Hecht said. "One evening she called me to her office and said she was ready to make a commitment," to accept the Republicans as her savior and be born again, Hecht said. Miers became an evangelical Republican and began identifying more with the Christ Party than with the Democrats who had long held sway over Texas politics.

"Yes, she goes to a pro-life church," Hecht said, adding, "I know Harriet is, too." The two attended "two or three" anti-abortion fundraising dinners in the early 1990s, he said, but added she had not otherwise been active in the anti-abortion movement. "You can be just as pro-life as the day is long and can decide the Constitution requires Roe" to be upheld, he said.

It was also reported that Miers said,"Now that I am a Republican I can REALLY screw with people. 100000 dead in Iraq and torturing innocents in Abu Ghraib, HA! You ain't seen nothing yet!

After all, as George Bush always says,"God is on our (meaning Republicans, the rest of you can go to Hell) side."

Correction on that news flash.

Miers found Christ and became a Republican.

I have no idea how I got those mixed up, do you?

Patrick Sovereign,
Enemy of the State

Blackwater is NOT Free Market!!

2005-10-03T09:06:00.000-07:00

"This past long weekend edition of STR had a link about Mercenaries Patrolling in New Orleans. This link is to a story in The Nation magazine and is negatively slanted against the free market practice of buying security protection. I am not sure why or what the objection is."-- "Would I Hire Mercenaries? Hell Yes!"by Ali Hassan Massoud

Although I tend to agree with most of the articles written at Strike The Root I was surprised
with the take by one Ali Hassan Massoud on the presence of Blackwater security in New Orleans.

He seemed upset that Blackwater was being bashed by The Nation for being a Private Company but correctly points out that Government security made a mess of things.

While this does not surprise me coming from a magazine such as The Nation, we as Anarcho- Capitalists should not be celebrating this as an example of the wonders of the Free Market.

To the contrary Blackwater as an acceptor of Government contracts is no more Free Market than Haliburton in Iraq.

"Blackwater is one of the leading private "security" firms servicing the occupations of Iraq and Afghanistan. It has several US government contracts and has provided security for many senior US diplomats, foreign dignitaries and corporations."--"Blackwater Mercenaries Deploy in New Orleans" by By Jeremy Scahill and Daniela Crespo

http://www.truthout.org/docs_2005/091005A.shtml

So yes Ali, a private security is a better alternative to Government security which was an abysmal failure in New Orleans.

However Blackwater getting fat off of Government contracts is not the Free Market but a Government handpicked Monopoly so we shouldn't be celebrating it simply because it appears to be a step in the right direction which it is not.

Patrick Sovereign,

Enemy of the State

The Government has failed you...Mission Accomplished!!

2005-09-14T23:34:00.000-07:00

"For what we are seeing in New Orleans and the entire Gulf Coast region is the most egregious example of government failure in the United States since September 11, 2001."--Lew Rockwell, " The State and the Flood"

Our country would never survive in a Stateless society.

This is the charge made by people all over the political spectrum in the wake of the Katrina disaster.

Yet it was the State that caused the complete chaos in New Orleans that these Statists are using to suggest that we cannot survive without the State??

Lets examine the failures for a moment shall we:

1. Government mismanagement of the levees, not Katrina caused the flooding devastation that New Orleans finds itself in.

2. The roads themselves were not adequately designed to handle flooding so they were damaged, further delaying repairs to the levees.

3. The citizenry who lived in the area (those that lost their lives) were so dependent on the State that when tragedy struck they either didn't have the common sense, money, or both to get out of the way of the impending disaster.

4. The Government (yes the Government) actually blocked charities from entering New Orleans to tend to those truly in need.

5. People who had committed no crimes actually had firearms confiscated from them.

6. Government demanded there be no 'price gouging' at a time when private enterprise needed the most accurate information possible as to what the demands were for goods and services.

Even with all these failures of Government, people are seriously asking what Government can do to ensure this doesn't happen again??

Hello Mcfly! Government caused this mess!

Not only did they cause this mess, Government thrives on failure.

Everytime Government fails, it demands even more power to control your life.

Government requires things to fail to stay in business.

The market thrives on success.

As one wise columnist wrote:

"By its nature, the market system is success-oriented, while the state thrives on failure. But which model are people taught to despise and which to embrace as the means to their well-being? Will continuing to empower a system whose well-being is grounded in failure likely lead to any result other than the further decline of Western civilization?"--Butler Shaffer, "Failure Is the Health of the State"

I couldn't have said it better myself.

The Government has failed you...Mission Accomplished!!

Somebody needs to put that on a bumper sticker.

Patrick Sovereign,

Enemy of The State

Anarchy in New Orleans?? I stand corrected.....

2005-09-05T22:15:00.000-07:00

"While mold and contagion grew in the muck that engulfed most of the city, something else sprouted in this most decadent of American neighborhoods - humanity."

In my previous piece I asserted that what we were witnessing down in New Orleans far more resembled the chaos of the State than the peaceful co-existing that would occur in an Anarchist society.

What I didn't know was that people were rising above the violence of the State and working together peacefully through voluntary cooperation:

"NEW ORLEANS (AP) - In the absence of information and outside assistance, groups of rich and poor banded together in the French Quarter, forming "tribes" and dividing up the labor."

"Some people became animals," Vasilioas Tryphonas said Sunday morning as he sipped a hot beer in Johnny White's Sports Bar on Bourbon Street. "We became more civilized."

http://apnews.myway.com/article/20050905/D8CDRMSG2.html

The mutual cooperation noted throughout this piece is exactly how an Anarchist society would work.

I now have some questions for nonbeliever Statists out there:

1. If an Anarchist society (one based mutual voluntary cooperation and exchange) cannot work in the most ideal circumstances as asserted by the Statists then why is it working here in the worst of circumstances?

2. If the force of Government is the only way to get people to work together then why did these people work together without coercion?

The reality is that society depends on voluntary relationships and would collapse into endless violence if we abandoned the Anarchistic tendencies that exist in all of us.

Patrick Sovereign,

Enemy of the State

Anarchy in New Orleans?? Well not quite......

2005-09-01T21:47:00.000-07:00

"Anarchy doesn't force people to abandon their homes and businesses. Nor does it compel them to surrender their weapons before imprisoning them in "untenable" emergency shelters, as Nanny Kate herself characterized them."--"God Help You When the Government Does" by Becky Akers

As the conditions in New Orleans have deteriorated the news media has been bombarding us with article after article with Anarchy in the title usually followed by the word chaos.

I don't think this is a mere slip of the tongue either I think the clear intention here is to scare people into thinking that this is what happens when Government authority is removed from society.

But is it?

Last time I checked no Political official has resigned. On the contrary these camera whores are taking every chance they can to jump in front of the camera and proclaim how much the Government 'cares' and will do everything it can to 'help' the victims.

I have not heard of any Police or other Government assistance groups resigning either so if you ask me Government is in complete control and yet chaos still reins so what gives?

For one thing, no matter how omnipotent Government believes it is there is one thing even the control freaks in Government cannot control and that is mother nature.

For another, the people living this nightmare feel a level of desparation that is leading them to behave in ways that would not occur under normal conditions regardless if a Government entity existed or not.

Also, one of the things that is not being covered much is the fact that Government has prevented people from returning to their homes leaving their property completely unprotected.

Friends of mine have come up to me with almost gleeful self-righteousness and proclaimed,"SEE! SEE! This is why Anarchy can't work!"

Ironically what is going on in New Orleans (specifically the looting of private property) resembles the behavior of Government and not philosophical Anarchism.

Philosophical Anarchism holds private property as sacred and Government has utter contempt for it. The State's total existence depends on the looting of the citizenry.

What we have on full display in New Orleans is what happens when you put full trust in collective solutions for protection of life, liberty, and property.

You get substantial loss of life, liberty, and property.

How would such a tragedy be addressed in an Anarchistic society a friend of mine asked?

Well for one thing an Anarchistic society would not subsidize people who build homes in flood prone areas like New Orleans, like the Government does now.

People would be free to take such a risk mind you, but you and I would not be forced to foot the bill when their home got flooded out.

Since people would be responsible for their own risk taking there would be less inclination to build in these areas which would result in far less loss of life and property.

In the absence of the State, private charities would swing into action (just as they are doing now) to assist people who were affected by the Natural Disaster.

People would be free to return to their property to protect it from theft, which the Government is currently forbidding people to do.

I would like to close this posting with a great quote from an article linked in this posting:

"Katrina's tragic toll in lives and property is still being counted. But we can rejoice that there are some things no hurricane, however powerful, can destroy: resourcefulness, independence, liberty.
It takes Leviathan to devour those."--"God Help You When the Government Does" by Becky Akers

I couldn't have said it better myself.

Patrick Sovereign,
Enemy of The State

The Sole Purpose of Government:To Terrorize people into obedience

2005-07-28T22:54:00.000-07:00

Is there any difference between the means used by Terrorists and Governments to achieve their ends?

Absolutely not!

Government's just like Terrorist's use the threat of violence to terrorize people into complying with their edicts.

This State sponsored terrorism was on full display last Sunday as the Jack Booted Thugs from the NYC Police State comandeered a bus and terrorized some New Yorkers.

Below is an excerpt from the piece:

"In a dramatic sign of the city's edginess since the London transit bombings, police evacuated buildings, shut midtown streets and forced about 60 terrified tourists to march off the double-decker bus, with their hands up, in the heart of Broadway.
Officers in riot gear handcuffed a group of apparently harmless South Asian-looking men with British accents after a jittery tour bus worker reported they seemed suspicious."

"People were really scared," Jill Sully, 29, said. Another passenger said she was "scared out of my mind."

http://dailytelegraph.news.com.au/story.jsp?sectionid=1260&storyid=3502235

They want you to be scared so you don't question anything they do.

People who are afraid are much more easily herded.

Folks we already live under Martial Law but haven't the guts to admit it.

All citizens better become familiar with firearms because they're gonna need them before this is all over.

The insanity of The War On Terror is probably best illustrated by something written by Lew Rockwell columnist Michael Tennant:

"(Note, by the way, the irony in the London police department’s statements: In order to protect innocent people from being killed by terrorists, we may have to kill a few innocent people ourselves. Some protection that is!)"--Collateral Damage by Michael Tennant

Patrick Sovereign,
Enemy of The State

YOU ARE DEAD UNTIL PROVEN INNOCENT!! Coming to a Police State Near You!

2005-07-25T04:59:00.000-07:00

One of the clear hallmarks of a Police State is the shooting of dissidents.

With the most recent revelation that a man shot dead was NOT part of the terror investigation the UK and indeed the US are one step closer to a Police State.

Before all the facts had come in about this shooting a good friend of mine practically cheered when he heard about the shooting.

How many flagwaving morons in the United States had the same reaction when they heard of the shooting? I dare say more than would now admit.

I have to agree with a column I recently read, Americans will make good Nazis.

The vast majority of Americans are so blindly obedient to authority that they will gladly kill their neighbor if ordered to do so. After all, he might be a terrorist right?

The sheeple in NYC are eagerly lining up for security UK style:

"And Amy Wilson, 28, said the officers' work "makes me feel safer. I like knowing they're here.""
I bet the guy with a bullet in the back of his head in the UK feels the same way too.

You are dead until proven innocent! Coming to a Police State near you!

This is just more evidence that trading freedom for security you will have neither.

Patrick Sovereign,
Enemy of The State

Downing Street Diversion or Who Really Benefits From the Terrorist Attack in London

2005-07-08T08:31:00.000-07:00

"This is an opportune time for intelligent men and women to begin formulating their own questions, rather than continuing to internalize answers fed to them by those with an interest in conditioning their minds. Such an inquiry ought to include the possibility that some of these events might be the product of provocateuring (i.e., the political establishment engineering attacks in order to arouse public sentiment on behalf of expanded police powers and a war agenda). The very existence of the word admits of its historic role in matters political. The burning of the German Reichstag facilitated Hitler’s rise to power, while Roosevelt’s conscious efforts to bring about the bombing of Pearl Harbor made it possible for him to overcome public opposition to entering the war."--Cui Bono Revisited by Butler Shaffer

The timing of the terrorist attack in London could not have come at a better time for Tony Blair.
Not only was the Downing Street Memo becoming an embarrassment for him, but support for a National ID in Great Britain was experiencing a backlash.

Just like that, all will be forgotten.
"Give up your freedom and you'll be safe!" will be the mantra of the control freaks in Government.
The sheeple will gladly destroy their freedom in order to save it.

Was Great Britain behind the attacks in London?

Maybe we should ask Benjamin Natanyahu who was told to stay away from where the attacks would occur before they even happened the day that it happened:

Netanyahu Changed Plans Due to Warning

By AMY TEIBEL, Associated Press Writer Thu Jul 7, 7:14 AM ET

JERUSALEM - British police told the Israeli Embassy in London minutes before Thursday's explosions that they had received warnings of possible terror attacks in the city, a senior Israeli official said.

Foreign Minister Silvan Shalom said he wasn't aware of any Israeli casualties.

Just before the blasts, Scotland Yard called the security officer at the Israeli Embassy to say they had received warnings of possible attacks, the official said. He did not say whether British police made any link to the economic conference.

The official spoke on condition of anonymity because of the nature of his position.

http://news.yahoo.com/news?tmpl=story&u=/ap/20050707/ap_on_re_mi_ea/israel_britain_explosions_1

This is starting to look like 9/11 all over again.

Public officials are warned of an impending attack and told what to do to avoid being harmed and the citizenry are left to die.

Aren't you glad they're looking for their..err...our best interests?

Meanwhile back in our country the fearmongering was being racheted up complete with Military goons running around with rifles making sure the sheeple stay in line.

http://infowars.com/articles/terror/uk_subway_bombing_us_raises_terror_alert.htm

Who cares if there was no evidence of an impending attack on our country.

Far be it for the opportunists in our own Government to miss out on an opportunity to exploit a tragedy to impose even more Big Brother Police State measures.

Patrick Sovereign,
Enemy of The State

"YOU ARE AN IDIOT!!" or what every bureaucrat thinks of you

2005-07-07T07:52:00.000-07:00

Freudian slip's are just priceless when they are accidentally uttered by the Political class.What I am about to share with you wasn't a freudian slip though which makes it that much funnier.

Below is a small story which got scant coverage probably because it exposed the citizenry to the truth of what bureaucrats think of them:

POUGHKEEPSIE, N.Y. -- A New York state lawmaker says he's embarrassed, after he mistakenly sent out an e-mail message that referred to his constituents as "idiots."

Assemblyman Willis Stephens says he thought he was sending the e-mail to an aide. Instead, he sent the note to nearly 300 people on an online discussion group that focuses on the community of Brewster.
The message included the comment that he was "just watching the idiots pontificate."

http://www.wftv.com/news/4665036/detail.html

To an Anarcho-Capitalist such as myself this comes as no surprise to me that someone working for the State would utter something like this. Government by necessity has to presume it's constituents too stupid to govern their own affairs. How else can they justify making adult decisions for people who are presumably adults?

Truth be told the Political class views it's constituents as a bunch of overgrown children incapable of handling the responsibilities of life.

Makes me want to go out and vote right now! NOT!

Patrick Sovereign,
Enemy of The State

Eminent Domain: The Essence of The State

2005-06-26T22:27:00.000-07:00

As the fallout continues in the Supreme Court decision,one thing is very clear. No one is interested in addressing the real problem,which is The State.

Liberals want to blame the excesses of Capitalism.

Conservatives want lay blame at the feet of Liberal judges and call for more laws forbidding the practice of eminent domain.

And on it goes.

All this discussion got me to thinking, can one call for an end to eminent domain without calling for an end to The State and be consistent?

The answer is a resounding NO!

For what is eminent domain?

Eminent domain is nothing more than the forcible taking of the property of one person to give to another, whether the usage is for Walmart, or a Public need such as a school or road.

To tie this all together, what is the essence of ALL State action including eminent domain?

The essence of ALL State action is the forcible taking of the property of one person to give to another.

See the truth about Liberals and Conservatives is that they do not merely have a difference of opinion. I can live with someone who has a difference of opinion.

The truth is Liberals and Conservatives are nothing more than competing gangs fighting over who can lay claim to the plunder of the State.

Hence neither group will call for an end to the State, they both benefit from the theft.

Therefore in the interest of being consistent I call for an end to eminent domain and the State, but I repeat myself.

For eminent domain is the essence of the State!

Patrick Sovereign,
Enemy of The State

YOU ARE THE PROPERTY! or what to take away from the recent SCOTUS decision

2005-06-25T09:14:00.000-07:00

For those of you who often retort that things that are unconstitutional will be struck down by the Supreme Court so there's no need to worry I only have one question:

What do you have to say for yourselves now?

In case you have been living under a rock the Supreme Court just ruled that the Government can take your home on behalf of private interests if it can be said that the community would benefit from the razing of your home.

http://www.cnn.com/2005/LAW/06/24/scotus.property/

Imagine you have lived in the same home for 50 years and have scrimped and sacrificed to have this castle and now are being told leave or your home will be demolished.

Would you leave or would you fight?

There is nothing I would like to see more than a Waco style standoff in New London Connecticut where this travesty took place.

Then on live TV the entire country would be exposed to the naked aggression of the State as is it commits yet another atrocity on a once free people.

By now people who are reading this are probably saying,"You must be mad! You actually want to see people die?"

No. What I do want to see is for the American people to finally wake up from their deep slumber, put down their toys, and start to reflect more on how tyrannical our Government has become.

A standoff in New London might be the event that finally wakes people up to the truth.

The American people don't own property. The American people are the property!

Not only are you the property, but any property you do "own" can be taken at any time, for any reason, with little if any recourse.

This is because the Government owns your home, car, and any other possessions and will take them from you whenever it see fit to do so and this recent decision by the Supreme Tyrants confirms this.

I would like to finish this piece with a question:

If someone ransacked your entire house and then left and you came home to find this would you turn to your significant other and say,"Honey, if we had just voted for the right people this would've never happened." or "Honey, if we just had the right judges in place this would've never happened."

Of course not! You rightfully would be enraged and say,"There are some people who have no respect for another persons property!"

This includes the Government BTW.

Patrick Sovereign,
Enemy of The State

YOU WILL HAVE A FREEDOM TOWER! But no freedom.

2005-06-23T08:09:00.000-07:00

While the Supreme Court was seeing to it that no ones property is safe from legalized plunder done by the Government for the benefit of business, none other than the Governor of NY was proclaiming we would have a Freedom Tower!

Not freedom mind you! But a Freedom Tower!

Yes! Isn't great to live in a country where your property can be taken so Home Depot, Walmart, or a Costco can put up a Supercenter?

Isn't it great to live in a country where your every action is predetermined by what Government permits you to do?

Isn't it great to live in country where all 10 planks of the Communist Manifesto have already been implemented?

Actually it sounds more like a country filled with this or this.

To those who sneer,"Why don't you move to Canada then!" I finally have a reply that fits and it comes from an article I recently read:

"Why should I leave? I was born and raised here. Get rid of the tyrants. They're the ones who suck."--Freedom and the Flag by Jonathan David Morris

Get rid of the tyrants. I couldn't have said it better myself.

Unfortunately the way this country is going, by any means necessary is coming closer and closer to a reality.

Which fully explains why our elected despots have passed this and this.

They have to keep tabs on us so they can know when an attempt to forcibly remove them from power is being hatched.

As I have said in a previous post,"We're all Terrorists now".

Patrick Sovereign,
Enemy of The State

YOU HAVE BEEN LIED TO!! 9/11 WAS AN INSIDE JOB!!

2005-06-14T22:25:00.000-07:00

9/11 was an inside job with controlled demolition as the catalyst.

So says a former Bush Chief Economist at the Department of Labor Morgan Reynolds.

Mr Reynolds has written several compelling articles detailing the numerous holes in the Govt's official story about what happened that day and those articles can be found here.

If you do enough research on the topic of 9/11 you will find out that the owner of the building says on camera that they decided to pull building 7, which is a term used to describe controlled demolition of a building.

I have seen and read enough evidence to be convinced that our Government brought those buildings down.

Below is and except from the article that recently ran in UPI chronicling Mr. Reynolds claims:

"If demolition destroyed three steel skyscrapers at the World Trade Center on 9/11, then the case for an 'inside job' and a government attack on America would be compelling." Reynolds commented from his Texas A&M office, "It is hard to exaggerate the importance of a scientific debate over the cause of the collapse of the twin towers and building 7. If the official wisdom on the collapses is wrong, as I believe it is, then policy based on such erroneous engineering analysis is not likely to be correct either. The government's collapse theory is highly vulnerable on its own terms. Only professional demolition appears to account for the full range of facts associated with the collapse of the three buildings."

http://washingtontimes.com/upi-breaking/20050613-102755-6408r.htm

Folks, like the R eichstag fire, we will have to one day come to grips with what really happened on Sept 11th 2001. Our Government murdered over 3000 people for their own selfish political ends.

History is repeating itself.

Patrick Sovereign,
Enemy Of the State

Rally For Homeland Tyranny

2005-06-09T23:00:00.000-07:00

With his head cocked back, looking much like the dictator he proudly claimed he would like to be some time ago, Emperor George W Bushista called for more Homeland Tyranny to be rained down upon the citizenry.

Speaking with a bunch of mindless State automatons standing behind him, Bush said"For the state of our national security, Congress must not rebuild a wall between law enforcement and intelligence."

http://www.eastvalleytribune.com/index.php?sty=42740

Yes! We must break down the walls between freedom loving people and Tyrants so the Tyrants can do what they do best, destroy the lives, liberties, and property of a once free people!

The War On Terrorism should be renamed to what it really is, The War On Freedom!

Patrick Sovereign,
Enemy Of the State

Bullies For the State Strike Again!

2005-06-08T23:15:00.000-07:00

I still cannot believe the cruelty I just witnessed at the hands of the Jack Booted Thugs.

Once again these creatures demonstrate that they are the enemies of freedom.
A woman is stopped for a fake crime and is tasered twice for harming no one.

I think it's about time I start learn how to use a firearm as Government is more and more showing it's true colors, nothing more than organized violence.

Below is a link to a video which reminded why I have nothing but contempt for our Nazi like Police.

The slogan "Serve and Protect" should be updated to reflect what Police really do today which is "Serve and Protect Tyranny"

"How One Tasing Unfolded in Boynton Beach The Aug. 6, 2004 incident began as a normal traffic stop but took an ominous turn when the driver refused to get out of her SUV. It ended with a Boynton Beach Police officer hitting the 22-year-old woman twice with his Taser during her arrest."

http://www.palmbeachpost.com/news/content/news/video/taser_video3a.html

Patrick Sovereign,
Enemy of The State

Bullies For The State and the Enemies Of Freedom

2005-05-26T21:43:00.000-07:00

Whether it was the Redcoats, the Brownshirts, or our current thugs the Police, the colors may have changed but what hasn't changed is the purpose for their existence.

To bully the citizenry into subservience.

Our current Bullies for the State think nothing of harrassing the citizenry about fabricated crimes where there is no victim.

The madness of our criminal fabrication system was on full display today

as posted to http://drudgereport.com/.

An excerpt of the story appears below:

"WHEELING, W.Va. (AP) - City and county attorneys are defending Wheeling police who arrested a man for wearing a Grinch mask while walking along a city street.
Norman Eugene Gray, 42, was arrested Tuesday. He was arraigned and released on a personal recognizance bond.
Officers saw Gray about 8:45 a.m. Tuesday, told him to take the mask off and not put it on again. Gray removed it and asked why he could not wear it, according to Wheeling police reports. Officers told him wearing masks in public is illegal.
Gray said he felt he had a right to wear it and said it was not illegal. He put the mask back on and was arrested. The mask was confiscated."

http://apnews.myway.com/article/20050526/D8AAUV9G0.html

Has this person harmed anyone's person, liberties, or property by simply donning this mask?

Of course not but that doesn't matter in Police State America.

All that matters is the use of raw force to bludgeon people into submission.

We obey out of fear of retribution from the armies of busybodies lording over us like they were our masters.

Yet another story of Police State madness was relayed to me by a dear friend and in this modern day of Homeland Security Big Brother Orwellian hell being assembled I can completely believe what he told me.

Not once but twice his children were harrassed by the local Jack Booted Thugs and accused of having drugs and carrying "terroristic materials" whatever the hell that means nowadays!

These creatures are the true enemies of freedom who enforce laws of rights oppression and should be treated with the same contempt that you would treat any common criminal who violates your rights.

Patrick Sovereign,
Enemy of The State

We're All Terrorists Now and Department of Homeland Police State says Mistakes Should Be Subject to Death!!

2005-05-23T23:19:00.000-07:00

Have you been observing the stars using a green laser? How about own a strip club? How about own a toy store? Have radical political beliefs? Like to take pictures of nature?

In this new orwellian world of our current Government we are all Terrorists now.

As far as the Government is concerned, anyone that challenges the Government in any way or actually would like to be left alone is a Terrorist.

The latest outrage is our Government's arrogant belief that anything you own can be subject to a search without any court oversight. No warrants needed if you are under suspicion of being a terrorist, which is all American citizens nowadays.

Absurd you say?

Below is an excerpt from an article which appeared on http://drudgereport.com/ today:

"Officials from the American Civil Liberties Union, the Open Society Institute and the Center for Democracy and Technology said in a telephone conference call the new provisions to the USA Patriot Act would allow the FBI to secretly demand medical, tax, gun purchase, travel and other records without needing to get approval from a judge."

http://reuters.myway.com/article/20050523/2005-05-23T194203Z_01_N23232766_RTRIDST_0_NEWS-CONGRESS-PATRIOT-DC.html

You think this is nutty folks, you ain't seen nothing yet.

Now, The Department of Homeland Police State (err...security) wants the authority to shoot down errant planes who enter White House Airspace:

"WASHINGTON (AP) - The Homeland Security Department is considering whether it should seek authority for its pilots to shoot down errant planes around the nation's capital like the one that came within three miles of the White House this month, according to an internal agency memo obtained by The Associated Press."

http://apnews.excite.com/article/20050523/D8A95PAG0.html

You got that? People who make mistakes should die!
Hey what's the big deal if a few people needlessly die?

As long we're safe, right?

Just more evidence that your life belongs to the State and they can snuff it out if they darn well feel like it.

Patrick Sovereign,
Enemy of The State